Confounding Equivalence in Observational Studies
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Methodological issues of confounding in analytical epidemiologic studies
Background: Confounding can be thought of as mixing the effect of exposure on the risk of disease with a third factor which distorts the measure of association such as risk ratio or odds ratio. This bias arises because of complex functional relationship of confounder with both exposure and disease (outcome). In this article, we provided a conceptual framework review of confounding issues in epi...
متن کاملThe alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams
BACKGROUND Confounders can produce spurious associations between exposure and outcome in observational studies. For majority of epidemiologists, adjusting for confounders using logistic regression model is their habitual method, though it has some problems in accuracy and precision. It is, therefore, important to highlight the problems of logistic regression and search the alternative method. ...
متن کاملConfounding Equivalence in Observational Studies (or, when are two measurements equally valuable for effect estimation?)
The paper provides a simple test for deciding, from a given causal diagram, whether two sets of covariates have the same bias-reducing potential under adjustment. The test requires that one of the following two conditions holds: either (1) both sets are admissible (i.e., satisfy the back-door criterion) or (2) the Markov boundaries surrounding the treatment variable(s) are identical in both set...
متن کاملAssessing observational studies of medical treatments
BACKGROUND Previous studies have assessed the validity of the observational study design by comparing results of studies using this design to results from randomized controlled trials. The present study examined design features of observational studies that could have influenced these comparisons. METHODS To find at least 4 observational studies that evaluated the same treatment, we reviewed ...
متن کاملHierarchical priors for bias parameters in Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
Recent years have witnessed new innovation in Bayesian techniques to adjust for unmeasured confounding. A challenge with existing methods is that the user is often required to elicit prior distributions for high-dimensional parameters that model competing bias scenarios. This can render the methods unwieldy. In this paper, we propose a novel methodology to adjust for unmeasured confounding that...
متن کامل